Don't get me wrong. I certainly don't think the scientists are doing anything wrong in qualifying their 'findings' - that's their job. I guess I just worry that, when Joe Public reads the article, he's going to go and react in the same way that he did in 1999, when mussels were literally flying off the shelves as people sought to immunise themselves against the evil cancer. After all, I eat mussels (some vegetarian...) and I haven't got cancer yet. So, who knows how they will react this time? Eat herrings by the dozen? Spend too much time in the sun? I can see the headline now: "Melanoma victim tells all: 'At least I didn't get MS'".The latest research into genes suspected of playing a role in individual susceptibility to the devastating auto-immune disease multiple sclerosis (MS) may also provide new clues to some of its most puzzling aspects in New Zealand.
A co-ordinator of the transtasman study, Professor Trevor Kilpatrick, Melbourne University's director of neuroscience, said early today that the two newly discovered gene locations on chromosome 12 and 20 might reveal the "potential involvement" of vitamin D in the risk of developing MS and related auto-immune diseases.
Anyway, sometimes science coverage in the Herald isn't that great is all.
EDIT: Planning a trip to the west coast of the US? I wouldn't if I were you - "Alarm bells ring over volcano find":
Honestly, this blog could write itself. Hey, that gives me an idea...A New Zealand geologist has triggered concerns about the possibility of another American "supervolcano" building under Mt St Helens.
[...] The discovery has revealed what may be an extraordinarily large zone of semi-molten rock, which would be capable of feeding a giant eruption.
neatly summed up by this diagram:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174
When you say that the mussels were "literally flying off the shelves"...
ReplyDeleteThere is some evidence that low levels of vitamin D are implicated in a number of health problems. This article is not the way to do so, however.
ReplyDelete