tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9139464357237074361.post3470405429961694351..comments2023-11-13T16:30:40.096+13:00Comments on Editing the Herald: Definitely not a test caseJameshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12661495023149576052noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9139464357237074361.post-23988106217923503682009-07-07T21:19:39.732+12:002009-07-07T21:19:39.732+12:00Whats happened to EtH? I miss it!Whats happened to EtH? I miss it!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9139464357237074361.post-14928345747441231412009-07-07T10:04:22.093+12:002009-07-07T10:04:22.093+12:00Alot more entertaining than the standard, though, ...Alot more entertaining than the standard, though, don't you think?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9139464357237074361.post-23817747820394994312009-07-06T17:44:46.789+12:002009-07-06T17:44:46.789+12:00Good lord a blog more infantile than the cak at Th...Good lord a blog more infantile than the cak at The StandardAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9139464357237074361.post-14919366763212349122009-07-01T20:44:46.009+12:002009-07-01T20:44:46.009+12:00"The other way allows the Herald to create a ..."The other way allows the Herald to create a catchy tagline (see also: "Pumpkin", "New Zealand's Youngest Convicted Killer")"<br /><br />As has been established through Your Views, Herald readers are STUPID. Catchy taglines help them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9139464357237074361.post-91724400317994300182009-07-01T11:16:11.693+12:002009-07-01T11:16:11.693+12:00I wish they'd start calling him the 'punch...I wish they'd start calling him the 'punch in the face dad'.Boganettehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07253374355820020132noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9139464357237074361.post-26844753404798493592009-06-30T16:16:49.135+12:002009-06-30T16:16:49.135+12:00There's a big difference between acknowledging...There's a big difference between acknowledging the dad claimed that he'd only flicked his son's ear as opposed to turning his (unsubstantiated) claim into a glib, misleading categorisation of the entire case.<br /><br />One way accurately reports the facts, to the extent that readers would be able to see there was nothing special about this case at all, and perhaps even realise that countless other cases with comparable facts don't get a mention. <br /><br />The other way allows the Herald to create a catchy tagline (see also: "Pumpkin", "New Zealand's Youngest Convicted Killer") and fuel the great fire of disinformation and ignorance that is the debate over the repeal of section 59 of the Crimes Act.Jordannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9139464357237074361.post-46458308722579323282009-06-30T15:13:24.173+12:002009-06-30T15:13:24.173+12:00Well, he wasn't guilty until a few weeks ago. ...Well, he wasn't guilty until a few weeks ago. Given that his defence was an ear flick, it would have been dangerous not to include the claim. Now he's sentenced, they can say what they like.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com